Month: March 2024

President Joe Biden and House Republicans said in separate statements on Tuesday that they have struck a deal on a government funding agreement for the rest of the fiscal year. Neither publicly announced details of the deal. It remains unclear if Congress will have enough time to pass the proposal before Saturday and avert a partial government shutdown this weekend. Congress needs to beat a Saturday morning deadline for the State, Defense, Homeland Security, Labor and Health and Human Services departments to keep operating; however, Republicans remain deeply divided and will likely need Democrat votes to pass, possibly putting Johnson’s job as speaker in jeopardy. The House is not expected to vote until the end of the week.

Biden said in a statement that an agreement had been reached, urging lawmakers to move as swiftly as possible to get the bill to his desk: “We have come to an agreement with congressional leaders on a path forward for the remaining full-year funding bills. The House and Senate are now working to finalize a package that can quickly be brought to the floor, and I will sign it immediately.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson confirmed that negotiators had reached a deal and that some major hurdles had been resolved, in particular funding the department of homeland security through the rest of the fiscal year. Johnson said on X: “An agreement has been reached for DHS appropriations, which will allow completion of the FY24 appropriations process. House and Senate committees have begun drafting bill text to be prepared for release and consideration by the full House and Senate as soon as possible.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said on X that both chambers were moving forward, with some details being worked out: “Senate and House leaders and the White House have reached an agreement to finish the final set of full year appropriations bills. The Senate and House Appropriations Committees are in the process of finalizing text and reports for Congress to closely review and consider ASAP.”

Editorial credit: Andrew Leyden / Shutterstock.com

A New York state judge has ordered that lawsuits against Reddit and Google’s YouTube can more forward, seeking to hold the social media platforms responsible for helping enable the avowed white supremacist who killed 10 Black people in 2022 at a Buffalo, New York, grocery store.

Justice Paula Feroleto of the Erie County Supreme Court said that the 25 plaintiffs can proceed with their lawsuit that is alleging that the social media platforms were designed to addict and radicalize users, which in turn gave the shooter, Payton Gendron, knowledge of the equipment and training needed for the mass shooting at Tops Friendly Markets in Buffalo, NY. Gendron, who was 18 at the time of the shooting, pleaded guilty to charges including murder and terrorism motivated by hate. He was sentenced in February 2023 to life in prison without parole, and also faces federal charges. The U.S. Department of Justice said in January it plans to seek the death penalty.

The civil lawsuits were filed by the gun control advocacy group Everytown Law; executive director Eric Tirschwell said: “We must hold accountable every single bad actor that prepared and equipped the shooter to target and kill members of Buffalo’s Black community.”  The 25 plaintiffs included store employees and customers who witnessed the May 14, 2022, shooting, and the son of one of those killed. Reddit and YouTube had sought a dismissal to the lawsuit, stating that they merely host third-party content and are not liable under a federal law governing such content: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, or the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment. However, the judge said the plaintiffs can attempt to show Reddit and YouTube owed them a duty because their platforms were defective and led to injuries, adding that the mental distress that many witnesses suffered justified their pursuit of negligence-based claims.

Reddit said in a statement that hate and violence have no place on its platform, and that they continue to evaluate means to remove such content. YouTube spokesman Jose Castaneda said that they will appeal the decision, while expressing its “deepest sympathies” for attack victims and their families

Editorial credit: Val Dunne Photography / Shutterstock.com